User talk:Manufracture

This user may have left Wikipedia. Manufracture has not edited Wikipedia since October 22, 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Manufracture, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! karmafist 18:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Hello, I noticed you moved some Daniel-related pages. From your edit summaries I can tell you had good intentions, but those moves were unnecessary. Check out Wikipedia:Disambiguation. In short, Daniel doesn't need to be disambiguated with (Biblical name) because the biblical name is definitely the primary meaning of the term. Other meanings are noted in the italic boilerplate. This is the standard way of doing things on Wikipedia; similar reasoning applies to Book of Daniel.

You may also want to familiarize yourself with the naming conventions. It's not advisable to use "the" in an article title when it's not actually part of something's title; like the Book of Daniel.

Also, if you want to move a well-established page, it's polite to leave a note on the Talk page announcing your intention, and giving others a chance to comment and discuss. - mako 23:16, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 22:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Just so you know, when you want to redirect a page (when you want something to a "see such and such") instead of keeping two articles the syntax #REDIRECT [[page name here]] is the accepted syntax. You got the bot auto warning because the redirect didn't match the pattern, I know its good faith and I've fixed it for you. If you have any questions feel free to leave me a message :) -- Tawker 07:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC) -- Tawker 22:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed you fixed it just after I saved this message, feel free to remove the bots warning message :) -- Tawker 22:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steele

No worries - remember, BE BOLD is a wikipedia rule so don't be shy in future. I'm glad we reached a consensus and am a bit embarrassed about the comments I made before reverting them. Michael Dorosh 20:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who wants to be a millionaire?

Hey, Manufracture. This is free-encyclopedia. Earlier today, Wikipedia surpassed a million and a half articles. I wanted to see what the millionth article was, so I typed in 'One millionth article,' and saw that you had redirected it to the one millionth article. Two things. First, thanks a lot, that was uber-helpful. Second, when did the number get reached? I saw you made the edit on July 5, but do you know when the actual event occured. Thanks. Free-encyclopedia 21:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in S and L Crisis

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on S and L Crisis, by DarkAudit, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because S and L Crisis is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting S and L Crisis, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate S and L Crisis itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JacobDRobida.jpg
[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JacobDRobida.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Berry_Propel_6_Pack.jpg
[edit]
I have tagged Image:Berry_Propel_6_Pack.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 09:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Steel Magnolias DVD.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Steel Magnolias DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cdman.JPG)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Cdman.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Missionhill.jpg
[edit]
I have tagged Image:Missionhill.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 22:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ayds.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Ayds.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Replaceable fair use Image:Steve_Dell_Ad.jpg
[edit]
~~Replaceable fair use~~
Thanks for uploading Image:Steve_Dell_Ad.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.

On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Replaceable fair use Image:Shirley_Ghostman.jpg
[edit]
~~Replaceable fair use~~
Thanks for uploading Image:Shirley_Ghostman.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.

On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 12:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Spaceballs 3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spaceballs 3. Since you had some involvement with the Spaceballs 3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 18:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Manufracture. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Making babies listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Making babies. Since you had some involvement with the Making babies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Plantdrew (talk) 05:39, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cleveland steamer listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A cleveland steamer. Since you had some involvement with the A cleveland steamer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 03:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Achey-Breaky Big-Mistakey" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Achey-Breaky Big-Mistakey. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#Achey-Breaky Big-Mistakey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Alabama Waterfall" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Alabama Waterfall. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#Alabama Waterfall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"All Porch, No Awning" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect All Porch, No Awning. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#All Porch, No Awning until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Beaver Paddle" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Beaver Paddle. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#Beaver Paddle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Kentucky waterfall" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kentucky waterfall. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#Kentucky waterfall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 18:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Camaro Crash Helmet" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Camaro Crash Helmet. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#Camaro Crash Helmet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 18:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Mississippi Mudflap" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mississippi Mudflap. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 27#Mississippi Mudflap until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 15:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Commonwealth Crewcut" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Commonwealth Crewcut. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 4#Commonwealth Crewcut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"SFLB" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect SFLB. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 4#SFLB until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Animal Liberation (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Animal Liberation (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal Liberation (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Normal Op (talk) 03:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Iwant to fuck you like an animal" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Iwant to fuck you like an animal. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 26#Iwant to fuck you like an animal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 14:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Black feet" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Black feet. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 17#Black feet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monkey-ed Movies

The article Monkey-ed Movies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are about Chimp Channel, not Monkey-ed Movies. Program blocks are rarely notable on their own

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Yep-Nope" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Yep-Nope and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 1#Yep-Nope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Kill yourself" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kill yourself and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 9#Kill yourself until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:13, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]